Sunday, February 9, 2014

Todays Topic: Eating Babies Like Chips- Taylor

Eating Babies Like Potato Chips.

Let's eat Mr. Potato head!


When my youngest cousin, Eliseo, was born, I made a few strange comments that I'm not necessarily proud of. One of them was calling him, a sack of potatoes. When he was a new born baby, he would sleep and sleep and sleep and do absolutely nothing else. His body was still developing, right before my very own eyes into a fully formed human body, but at the moment he looked like a cute blob. So he was my potato boy. I, somewhat, identify in comparing children to food like in Jonathon Swift's A Modest Proposal. However, Swift takes the function of turning children into food a step further. Swift wants to take malnourished children and turn them into something useful for the commonwealth. Poor children, predominantly of Catholic origin, are being starved throughout the regions of Ireland. He proposes fattening them up and serving them to the wealthy Irish landowners. Child birthing would become a new job, for all those pregnant women out there. They'd sell their babies into the meat market at the age of one. Yes, some think it's vulgar, but  some of the pros that Swift suggests possess positive economic, social, and political value for the Irish common wealth. First, husbands would be nicer to their wives, because now, they'd earn some income on the side for getting pregnant all the time! Second, instead of having to provide for another child, they could just sell the ones they don't like for money. Third, chefs would have an entirely new field of meat to experiment and create recipes for! Fourth, Ireland and its wealthy landowners will become culturally enriched through its new food source, (talk about the tourism its going to bring).  Finally,...Obviously, you'd probably value your kids more, because now you get to choose which ones you can sell and which ones you don't have to keep.

Swift's proposal is probably the best solution to history's problems. I mean, why isn't Congress looking to mold their social programs after his model nowadays? The answer to solving Washington's big problems with the economy is right in front of us. Some brilliant master mind thought it up two hundred years ago! All we have to do is change our product. We don't need to shut down the government, all we need to do is to start selling immigrants in the meat markets. And we'd have so many flavors! Asian, Mexican, African, European..You name it..The U.S. has it! That's how our economy's gonna start thriving again. Okay, maybe we have more problems than that and should not take Swifts' proposal literally. I mean, that's probably murder...So... Perhaps we too, should look at our problems more closely,  and analyze the state of mind in which we find our ideals and principles of our country, as Swift did when he wrote about the state of his country, Ireland, back then. Swift makes us think about the state of our principles and priorities. How many of us put economic priorities over our priorities for preserving the quality of human life first? We choose cheaper fast food than home-cooked meals because we're lazy and it's cheap. Perhaps, our consequences and choices are not shed in a vulgar light like Swift's proposal for eating children. But the economic choices we make somehow, will eventually, and probably indirectly affect humanity and our value for the standard of living. Everything is connected although it's hard to see. We must look further than simply settle with something at face value.

-Laura Miller


Tuesday, February 4, 2014

Salon Talk of the day: Candide and the "Can-dide" Pope


Salon Talk of the day: Candide and the "Can-dide" Pope

IS THIS OUR FATE?!



Yes, it is true. A guy named Pope wrote Essay on Man. I'm assuming that he isn't the Pope we all think he is; the Pope that drives around in a cute little car called "The  Pope Mobile", kissing babies and blessing people on the streets of Vatican City. No, this is another guy. But his name is somewhat intimidating, and it does reinforce a religious consciousness to his writings of what he believes' man's role in the world to be. Basically, Pope claims that man should make do with their lot in life and be content. "Everything happens for a reason," is that annoying quote you're mother will tell you when you're a bench warmer on the school volleyball team and when the coach only puts you in for the last two minutes of the game. Well, that's what happened to me! But this piece of advice continues to frustrate me, today. Hold on! How was I suppose to follow that advice back then? Was I suppose to sit and wait for something to happen? Maybe I'd grow two feet taller and spike the ball harder into someone's face! But that, of course, never happened...( just my own misery and failure).
But, a man named Voltaire argues against this philosophy in his book, Candide. Voltaire's characters believe in this very philosophy and apply it to every situation. Disaster after disaster, they constantly are reassured, hoping that although bad things happen to them, something good will come of the chaos.  I'd say that Pope just got "Cann-dide" by Voltaire. They're broken by the end of the book. Will they build a society on the remnants of what spirit they each have left? I don't know how that would be possible. The book shows us the hell that these characters suffer with a lack of taking action. They lack initiative for  freedom to make sense of the chaos, freedom to challenge it, and the freedom to make change to better their lots in life. These touch upon some of the Enlightenment characteristic: Reason, Progress, and liberty.
When I think of what Pope expresses throughout his poem, he claims that man's undoing is due to our own greediness and pride. We hunger for knowledge and power. We strive to raise ourselves up to a level of godliness. Yet, humanity can only understand so much. What much we CAN comprehend, is the information of the world that we should be satisfied with. We are not capable of seeing the entire truth. If we were to see the actual beings or things that made the shadows in Plato's cave, we'd probably go crazy, and we wouldn't be able to survive. Hence, humanity must accept its lot, and its place as slave or master, subservient to a higher power we can never understand. Humanity must accept its fate, its life, and its death. Pope's stance goes against everything the Enlightenment represents. Although Voltaire's work is an exaggeration of the human experience when dealing with chaos, I believe  his view on progress, reason, and equality are evident and speak for themselves throughout our history. So how can we just settle for our lots in life? Whether we truly are fated to be something or not, well that's up to interpretation. I, myself, like to think that I have free will to choose the path I take.

Laura Miller